2025 – 3000 AD · speculative

Bahai-Inspired Future Stages of Civilization

A long-range scenario exploring how humanity might move from today’s fragmented world toward the Lesser Peace, a World Super-State, the Great Peace, and early hints of the Most Great Peace – in political, economic, and social terms.

← Religious history Other future scenarios →
Scenario only · not prophecy Decades: 2025–2100 Centuries: 2100–3000

Timeline: 2025–3000 AD

Decade by decade from 2025 to 2100, then century by century to 3000. Each step imagines how political, economic, and social dynamics could gradually move toward greater unity. Everything beyond the present is speculative.

2025–2029 · Early Preconditions for the Lesser Peace

Shocks, reluctant cooperation, and moral questioning

  • Politics: Major-power tensions and regional wars continue, but climate disasters, cyber incidents, and pandemics push states into deeper cooperation on risk management and crisis response.
  • Economy: AI and automation disrupt labour markets. Some states expand social protection and experiment with new tax regimes on large digital and multinational actors.
  • Society: Youth movements, human-rights coalitions, and religious communities highlight themes of global justice, stewardship, and solidarity.
  • Bahai lens: No Lesser Peace yet, but a growing recognition that survival depends on cooperation, not just competition.

2030–2039 · Proto-Lesser Peace Dynamics

Regional compacts and shared risk frameworks

  • Politics: Regional unions strengthen collective-security and mediation mechanisms. Large wars are still possible, but seen as increasingly reckless in a tightly connected world.
  • Economy: Carbon pricing, resilience bonds, and global funds for adaptation become more common, especially after a series of climate-driven emergencies.
  • Society: Interfaith and intercultural initiatives move from the margins into mainstream civic life, especially in diverse cities.
  • Bahai lens: A pattern of pragmatic cooperation deepens; the scaffolding for a political Lesser Peace begins to emerge.

2040–2049 · Shock, Reform, and Narrow Escapes

Danger pushes toward reluctant peace

  • Politics: A near-catastrophic crisis involving cyber, AI, or space systems forces emergency diplomacy. In the aftermath, new treaties limit certain weapons and create stronger verification regimes.
  • Economy: Recognition that instability anywhere can disrupt supply chains and finance leads to more inclusive economic governance and debt-relief frameworks.
  • Society: Large segments of the public in many countries now see major-power war as morally unacceptable and materially suicidal.
  • Bahai lens: The world edges closer to a political Lesser Peace based on fear of mutual harm and awareness of interdependence.

2050–2059 · Emergent Lesser Peace

Institutionalising basic political peace

  • Politics: Revised global charters and regional agreements make aggressive war harder to wage. Collective-security arrangements and arbitration become more routine.
  • Economy: Coordinated climate policy and regulation of global finance reduce some systemic risks, though inequality persists.
  • Society: Global-citizenship education and narratives of a single human family become more common, alongside local service projects.
  • Bahai lens: This decade plausibly corresponds to an early form of the Lesser Peace: a mainly political peace sustained by law, interests, and institutions.

2060–2069 · Stabilising the Lesser Peace

From ad-hoc fixes to a coherent peace architecture

  • Politics: Regional unions coordinate more closely with reformed global bodies on security, advanced-tech governance, and migration.
  • Economy: Global frameworks for AI, biotech, and data are refined to prevent abuses while enabling innovation. Extreme poverty drops further.
  • Society: Interfaith and intercultural literacy become basic civic skills; local assemblies and councils focus on building cohesive communities.
  • Bahai lens: The Lesser Peace is now recognizable: major wars are rare, heavily constrained, and widely delegitimised.

2070–2079 · Early World-Commonwealth Features

Steps toward a planetary political order

  • Politics: Some regional blocs adopt semi-federal structures. A strengthened world assembly with limited but real powers emerges.
  • Economy: Global minimum standards for labour, environment, and taxation reduce the worst “race to the bottom” behaviour.
  • Society: More people see themselves as part of overlapping communities: local, national, regional, and global, without feeling forced to choose just one.
  • Bahai lens: Early ingredients of a future World Super-State appear above the level of nation-states.

2080–2089 · Shared Law & Global Commons

World-level rules for dangerous domains

  • Politics: Binding regimes now govern nuclear weapons, high-risk AI, geoengineering, and orbital infrastructure, overseen by a world court and assembly.
  • Economy: A global floor of social protection is recognised – basic health, food, shelter, and education for all, co-financed through national and world-level resources.
  • Society: Multi-ethnic, multi-faith cities are the norm; anti-discrimination norms are widely internalised.
  • Bahai lens: The skeleton of a World Super-State becomes clearer: layered, federal, and focused on shared risks and commons.

2090–2099 · Transitional World Super-State

From alliance of states to world commonwealth

  • Politics: A “World Commonwealth Charter” (or similar) is adopted by most states and unions, establishing a world executive, legislature, and judiciary with defined, limited competences.
  • Economy: Markets operate within strong global ethical guardrails; exploitation and ecologically destructive practices are increasingly constrained.
  • Society: People expect large problems to be handled at world level. Religious communities, including Bahai communities, contribute to the underlying moral language of unity and justice.
  • Bahai lens: A plausible phase of the World Super-State: still imperfect, but clearly beyond a mere network of treaties.

2100–2199 · 22nd Century · Foundations of the Great Peace

From enforced peace to partially internalised peace

  • Politics: The world commonwealth weathers legitimacy crises and learns to balance global authority with local and national autonomy.
  • Economy: Intergenerational justice and ecological regeneration are explicit policy criteria; multi-century restoration projects are launched.
  • Society: Education stresses service, cooperation, and equality. Bahai communities and others help build grassroots cultures of consultation and unity.
  • Bahai lens: The Great Peace begins to appear: institutions and culture move beyond mere non-war toward active unity.

2200–2299 · 23rd Century · Cultural Integration

Multiple worldviews under one civilisational roof

  • Politics: Representation at world level is more democratic and inclusive; cultural and religious councils advise on long-term impacts.
  • Economy: Global inheritance norms, commons-based ownership, and robust local economies help narrow extreme wealth gaps.
  • Society: Hybrid identities are standard. Different ethical frameworks coexist within a shared commitment to human dignity and justice.
  • Bahai lens: The Great Peace is visible as a stable, evolving pattern rather than a fragile experiment.

2300–2399 · 24th Century · Shared Global Ethic

A common moral vocabulary emerges

  • Politics: The existence of a world commonwealth is a given; debate focuses on reform, not abolition.
  • Economy: Success is measured by well-being, resilience, and cultural flourishing, not just output.
  • Society: A shared narrative of humanity’s journey from division to unity circulates in education and art, interpreted through diverse spiritual and philosophical lenses.
  • Bahai lens: The Great Peace is well established: structures and culture both reflect the oneness of humankind.

2400–2499 · 25th Century · Spiritual Civilization Deepens

From external order to inner orientation

  • Politics: Governance grapples with subtler issues: preventing complacency and ensuring institutions remain servants, not masters.
  • Economy: Material needs are largely met; emphasis shifts toward meaningful work, creativity, and service.
  • Society: Questions of purpose, character, and spiritual growth loom larger. Bahai teachings and others offer ways to integrate science, ethics, and inner life.
  • Bahai lens: This aligns well with an advanced Great Peace: a civilisation shaped increasingly by spiritual principles.

2500–2599 · 26th Century · Early Hints of the Most Great Peace

Aligning capability with conscience

  • Politics: Conflicts persist but are mostly non-violent, channelled through law and consultation. World-level authority is viewed as a form of trusteeship.
  • Economy: Structural safeguards and culture reduce destructive booms and busts; moderation and balance are widely valued.
  • Society: Communities prize virtues as much as innovation. Spiritual practices are integrated into ordinary life in diverse ways.
  • Bahai lens: While the full Most Great Peace is beyond any human scenario, this century shows early resonance: growing harmony between inner life and outer order.

2600–2699 · 27th Century · Mature Stewardship

Handling advanced power with long-term care

  • Politics: Humanity wields immense power – terrestrial and possibly off-world – but uses it with increasing restraint and foresight.
  • Economy: Post-scarcity dynamics coexist with chosen simplicity; societies intentionally limit certain forms of consumption.
  • Society: Ideas like “service to humanity” and “planetary trusteeship” are deeply internalised norms.
  • Bahai lens: The Most Great Peace can be glimpsed in the stable alignment of advanced capability with moral maturity.

2700–2799 · 28th Century · Millennial Planning

Civilisation organised on thousand-year horizons

  • Politics: World and regional institutions sponsor projects spanning many generations: ecosystem restoration, knowledge preservation, and safe handling of high-risk technologies.
  • Economy: Finance and governance mechanisms are tuned to multi-century stability rather than short-term gain.
  • Society: People see themselves as stewards in a long chain of generations. Spiritual and philosophical traditions provide language for this responsibility.
  • Bahai lens: Such long-horizon stewardship is consistent with advanced stages of the Most Great Peace.

2800–2899 · 29th Century · Diversity Within Stable Unity

Many paths under a shared ethical canopy

  • Politics: Regions maintain distinct governance styles within global norms that protect rights and prevent systemic violence.
  • Economy: Cooperative, market-regulated, and commons-based models coexist; exploitative systems are constrained by law and culture.
  • Society: Religious and worldview diversity remains rich, but rivalry is largely replaced by cooperation and mutual respect.
  • Bahai lens: The Most Great Peace includes mature diversity that no longer threatens underlying unity.

2900–2999 · 30th Century · Quiet Strength of a Unified World

Everyday life in long-lasting peace

  • Politics: World institutions are renewed and reformed periodically, but remain trusted and stable. Local self-government is vibrant.
  • Economy: Material security is widespread. The main questions are how to use abundance wisely and preserve beauty and meaning.
  • Society: Most people grow up with a lived sense that “humanity is one family.” Personal and collective challenges are addressed within a framework that assumes cooperation as the default.
  • Bahai lens: No scenario can capture the full depth of the Most Great Peace, but this century can be imagined as one snapshot: outer life broadly aligned with an inner ethic of oneness.

Beyond 3000 AD · Open Horizons

Further chapters unwritten

  • History continues. New challenges, renewals, and transformations arise. Bahai teachings and other spiritual and philosophical traditions would keep offering guidance as humanity navigates later stages of its story.